Episode 30

Host: Jill Mastroianni

Guest: Jason Gichner

Why an Innocent Woman Spent 27 Years in Prison

Imagine spending 27 years in prison for a crime you didn’t commit. That was the reality for Joyce Watkins, a woman wrongfully convicted in 1989 of the rape and murder of her four-year-old great-niece. Joyce and her longtime partner, Charlie Dunn steadfastly maintained their innocence. But flawed medical testimony, prosecutorial missteps, and systemic biases led to their conviction and life sentences. Charlie tragically died in prison after 27 years, while Joyce was paroled in 2015, branded as a registered sex offender. Even in the face of wrongful conviction, parole restrictions, and decades of injustice, Joyce never gave up her agency. 

Jill talks with Jason Gichner, Executive Director of the Tennessee Innocence Project, about Joyce’s fight to clear her name, how wrongful convictions happen, and what her story teaches us about resilience, justice, and protecting your voice. Together, they explore how the Tennessee Innocence Project works to exonerate innocent people, the flaws in the justice system, and the ways all of us can contribute to this vital mission.

What We Discussed

  • The Tennessee Innocence Project: The Tennessee Innocence Project is a non-profit law firm that represents people who are actually innocent, people convicted of crimes they did not commit. The project’s typical client has been wrongly imprisoned for decades. On average, the project’s clients who have been exonerated served more than 26 years in prison for crimes that they did not commit. Besides direct litigation, the Tennessee Innocence Project engages in policy work to prevent wrongful convictions. 

  • Joyce Watkins’ story. Joyce became entangled in a tragedy after caring for her great-niece for just nine hours. The child arrived at Joyce’s home already injured, showing signs of bleeding and cognitive distress. Joyce sought medical attention for the child but flawed medical testimony later pointed the blame at Joyce and her longtime partner, Charlie. The prosecution offered Joyce a plea deal of one year if she said Charlie committed the crimes. She refused, unwilling to send an innocent man to prison.

  • How expert testimony, even if incorrect, can shape the outcome of a case. Joyce and Charlie’s conviction rested almost entirely on flawed forensic testimony. The original medical examiner claimed that because she didn’t see a particular healing cell, called a histiocyte, in brain slides, the child’s fatal injury must have occurred during the nine hours she was with Joyce and Charlie. That “proof” became the linchpin of the prosecution’s case. Decades later, independent experts, including Tennessee’s chief medical examiner and a pediatric neurologist from Vanderbilt Children’s Hospital, confirmed that the theory was biologically impossible.

  • The impossible choices innocent people face, including why some plead guilty to crimes they didn’t commit. In the middle of Joyce’s trial, prosecutors offered her a one-year sentence if she would testify that Charlie committed the rape and murder. She refused, unwilling to condemn an innocent man, and took a life sentence instead.

  • Why innocent people sometimes plead guilty. Innocent people sometimes plead guilty when the risk of trial feels too great. Prosecutors hold immense leverage, threatening decades behind bars or even life in prison, while dangling plea deals that offer immediate release or probation. For people who cannot afford bail, who fear a jury will believe false evidence, or who simply want to return home to their families, pleading guilty may feel like the only rational option, even when they did nothing wrong.

  • The exoneration process: how Joyce’s case was reopened, the collaboration with prosecutors, and the eventual exoneration. Joyce arrived at the Tennessee Innocence Project years after her parole, determined to clear her name. Jason’s team reinvestigated, uncovering both junk science and suppressed evidence, including police reports proving that sheets prosecutors claimed Joyce had “washed to destroy DNA” were never washed at all. The Tennessee Innocence Project brought their findings to Nashville’s Conviction Review Unit, one of only two such units in Tennessee. The District Attorney’s office conducted its own independent investigation and reached the same conclusion: Joyce and Charlie were innocent. In December 2021, both convictions were overturned. By early 2022, all charges were dismissed, and Joyce and Charlie were formally exonerated. Tragically, Charlie had already died in prison of cancer, never living to see his name cleared.

  • Life after exoneration: the ongoing fight for compensation, the barriers under Tennessee law, and what exonerees face when re-entering society. Exoneration restored Joyce’s freedom, but not her lost decades. Tennessee law allows wrongfully convicted individuals to seek up to $1 million in compensation, but the process is riddled with obstacles. Even after a judicial exoneration, an exoneree must apply for a “certificate of exoneration” from the governor’s office, a process requiring another hearing before the parole board. Despite unanimous support from the parole board, there has been no action from the governor’s office on Joyce’s case. Charlie’s family may never qualify for relief at all, since the statute excludes adult children of the wrongfully convicted. And beyond money, exonerees face steep challenges reintegrating into society: trauma from years behind bars, lost opportunities, and the need to rebuild lives from scratch. The Tennessee Innocence Project supports its clients holistically, with therapy, housing help, benefits, and community. But as Jason emphasized, freedom after decades in prison doesn’t erase the damage done.

Link

Connect with Jill:

Did you enjoy this episode? Share it with someone you care about.

Next

Episode 29: Why Your Business Needs an Estate Plan, Too